全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语2023届Y1

全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语2023届Y1正在持续更新，目前答案城为大家整理了相关试题及答案，供大家查缺补漏，高效提升成绩。

本文从以下几个角度介绍。

1、全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语2024
2、2023-2024全国一百所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语
3、2023-2024全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语一
4、2023-2024全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷答案英语
5、2023-2024全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语三答案
6、2023-2024全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷21ccj英语
7、2024全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷二英语
8、2023-2024全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷二英语
9、全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语一2024
10、2023-2024全国100所名校最新高考冲刺卷英语一答案

A.J.Hayes,a leader (and no relation to me )wrote in 1964:Automation is not just a newkind of mechanization but a revolutionary force capable of overturning our social order.Whereasmechanization made workers more efficient-and thus more valuable-automation threatens to makethem superfluous（过剩的)-and thus without value.The opinions I have cited here representextreme positions,and there were also many milder views.But I think it's fair to say that most earlystudents of automation,including both critics and enthusiasts,believed the new technology wouldlead us into a world where people worked much less.As for economic consequences,worries about unemployment have certainly not gone away-notwith job losses in the current recession approaching 2 million workers in our country alone.But recentjob losses are commonly attributed to causes other than automation,such as competition fromoverseas or a roller-coaster financial system.In any case,the vision of a world where machines doall the work and people stand idly by has simply not come to pass.The spread of automation outside of the factory has altered its social and economic impact insome curious ways.In many cases,the net effect of automation is not that machines are doing workthat people used to do.Instead we've dispensed with the people who used to be paid to run themachines,and we've learned to run them ourselves.These trends contradict almost all theexpectations of early writers on automation,both optimists and pessimists.So far,automation hasneither liberated us from the need to work nor deprived (us of the opportunity to work.Instead,we're working more than ever.What about trades closer to my own vital interests?Will science be automated?Technologyalready has a central role in many areas of research;for example,genome sequences could not beread by traditional lab-bench methods.Replacing the scientist will presumably be a little harder thanreplacing the lab technician,but when a machine exhibits enough curiosity and tenacity,I think we'lljust have to welcome it as a companion in zealous research.And if the scientist is elbowed aside byan automaton,then surely the science writer can't hold out either.I'm ready for my 15-hour workweek.31.In Paragraphl,the writer mainly wants to convey thatA.automation results in unemploymentB.automation does more harm than goodC.the issue of automation was still in discussionD.automation brings in much convenience in life